Republicans are using fraud scandals against Democrats in key races

By TORRIE HERRINGTON, NOTUS for The Maine Monitor

Republicans are trying their best to tie Democrats to fraud this election cycle.

President Donald Trump has spent months hammering Minnesota for its handling of a welfare scheme. The Republican National Committee has referred to Maine’s governor, who is now running for Senate, as “Fraudulent Janet Mills.”

And the National Republican Congressional Committee has singled out multiple candidates who they say failed to stop fraud on their home turf.

The National Republican Congressional Committee criticized Maine House (CD 2) candidate Matt Dunlap for his work as a state auditor. (Photo by Robert F. Bukaty of the Associated Press)

“Billions of dollars intended for families and communities in need have been diverted to benefit fraudsters,” NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella said in a statement. “Working families are furious, and Democrats can’t run on ‘anti-corruption’ while their own states are ground zero for massive fraud.”

Both parties are seeking to mix other alleged malfeasance into their affordability messaging. Democrats are emphasizing anti-corruption policies and the Epstein files scandal, saying their opponents are protecting elites over ordinary Americans.

Republicans are countering that Democrats have looked the other way on fraud, allowing people to take benefits meant to go to the people who need them.

Republican strategist Matthew Bartlett, who served as a political appointee in the first Trump administration and is co-founder of Darby Field Advisors, said fraud is on voters’ minds right now, particularly after the federal government sent large amounts of money out via the states.

“Very legitimate questions about ‘where did all this money go?’ exist,” Bartlett said. “Very sadly, I think there are instances of waste, fraud and abuse. So that is in the public interest, that is a legitimate question if you’re an elected official.”

However, he said, “Is this the top priority of the American voting public right now? No.”

Emily Cain, former Maine state senator and executive director of EMILYs List, agreed that fraud is important to root out but not at the top of voters’ minds.

“If someone is breaking the law or taking advantage of a system they should be held accountable. That is just true. But is fraud the thing that people are thinking about when they’re going to the grocery store this week? No, it’s not,” Cain said. “Republicans are feeding them a narrative of fraud because they don’t have anything else to campaign on right now.”

Democrats largely argue that the ties between them and alleged fraud perpetuated by outside actors is tenuous, such as pinning alleged health care fraud on a candidate for supporting a health care policy.

In Maine, there is a potential fraud scandal underway. The state paused payments to Gateway Community Services, which overbilled MaineCare, the state’s Medicaid program, for interpretation services by more than $1 million, according to an audit by the Department of Health and Human Services. Gateway denies the allegations of fraud.

The NRCC is targeting state auditor Matt Dunlap, who is running for Maine’s 2nd Congressional District, by claiming he failed in his role and should have included Gateway as part of his audit that included Maine Department of Health and Human Services.

In a statement in response to the allegations, Dunlap campaign manager Harry Burke said, “The work of the Auditor of Maine is confidential. Period. Matt will not comment on any audit that may or may not be conducted. The audit work will speak for itself.”

In a conversation about general audit practices, Dunlap explained that his job as state auditor is to audit the major agencies, such as the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, and not the smaller nonprofits or programs which get their funding from the major agencies.

For example, in the 2024 audit report, there are recommendations for the state DHHS on how to better operate, but none of the smaller organizations it works with are listed in the audit; that is something DHHS audits internally.

“The purpose of an audit is to improve an organization. We’re not trying to play gotcha, we’re trying to help these agencies be better,” Dunlap said. “If business is the language, auditing is a spellcheck.”

Republicans also singled out one of Dunlap’s Democratic opponents, state Sen. Joe Baldacci, saying he was tied to the potential fraud. Baldacci voted in favor of expanding MaineCare.

“Anyone who defrauds MaineCare should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Period,” Baldacci said, adding that he has long been a champion for affordable health care.

The Republican National Committee has targeted Senate candidate Gov. Janet Mills, connecting her to fraud in multiple statements pointing to Medicaid overbilling and refusing to turn over SNAP data to the federal government.

Mills accused the Trump administration of using fraud as an excuse to attack Maine with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“This is part of President Trump’s malicious playbook of using his administration’s power to punish anyone who dares to stand up to him or who disagrees with him,” Mills said in the Feb. 9 statement. “That is why as governor, my Administration has implemented new and unprecedented licensing requirements for Medicaid providers, prioritized audits, and worked directly with State and Federal authorities to hold accountable individuals who attempt to defraud our state.”

The push goes beyond Maine.

The NRCC accused Democratic Rep. Dave Min in California’s 47th Congressional District of trying to cover up fraud because he dismissed the administration’s investigation into Minnesota as “partisan and racist” during a House Oversight Committee hearing.

The Min campaign pointed out that the lawmaker started out his remarks in the hearing by calling what happened in Minnesota “ fraud of the worst kind” and calling for “aggressive enforcement and accountability when it comes to taxpayer dollars and their disbursement.”

Min called the hearing “partisan and racist” because “we have not had other hearings when it comes to fraud that takes place in Republican-led states. We have not had hearings in this committee as far as I am aware or on any other committee this year as long as I’ve been in Congress that go after those who are not Somali-American.”

The NRCC said that Min should be more concerned about fraud at home in California.

“I started my career as an SEC enforcement attorney, where I cracked down on corporate greed and fraud. As a member of the Oversight Committee, I will always fight for accountability with your taxpayer dollars, weeding out fraud wherever it is discovered,” Min said in a statement to NOTUS.

In New York, then-Republican candidate for attorney general Khurram Dara called for an investigation into New York’s Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program — with a dig at Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul.

“In Minnesota, a fraud measured in the hundreds of millions triggered indictments, federal coordination, and asset seizures,” Dara, who dropped out of the race last week. “In New York, a program with more than $10 billion a year flowing through it was allowed to operate for years with virtually no enforcement. The scale here is far larger, yet the response was far weaker.”

A spokesperson for Hochul called the claim “old news.”

“Governor Hochul already put an end to waste, fraud and abuse in CDPAP by cutting out hundreds of middlemen over a year ago — and it’s already saving over $1 billion for New York taxpayers,” the spokesperson said.

________________

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Torrie Herrington covers the Maine and Vermont congressional delegations for NOTUS, in partnership with The Maine Monitor and VT Digger. Torrie grew up in Arkansas and graduated from the University of Central Arkansas with a bachelor’s degree in journalism and public relations. At UCA, she was editor in chief of the student newspaper, The Echo, where she reported on local political races, a professor accused of misconduct, campus events and more. She has also interned at the Log Cabin Democrat, where she covered community events and nonprofits. You can contact her at TorrieHerrington@notus.com

NOTE: This story was produced as part of a partnership between NOTUS, a publication from the nonprofit, nonpartisan Allbritton Journalism Institute and The Maine Monitor, a nonpartisan, nonprofit news organization covering the state of Maine.

Mayor refuses to give up on plan to oust Angers

Biddeford Mayor Marty Grohman seems ready to take another bite at the apple when it comes to ousting Roch Angers from the planning board, despite broad public opposition.

On Tuesday, Grohman presented the council with his recommendation to remove Angers from the Biddeford Planning Board.  Only councilor William Emhiser was willing to take up the matter, but his motion failed to get a second from another member of the council.

While most people considered the issue dead on arrival, Grohman says he is still exploring ways to remove Angers from the board.  

Biddeford Mayor Marty Grohman

On August 5, Angers, a member of the planning board, brought his own personal concerns to the council regarding how the city was handling the University of New England’s proposal to construct a large pier near its Biddeford campus.

RELATED: Planning board member blasts city council

When contacted by the Gazette on Friday, Grohman remained steadfast in his effort to remove Angers. 

“I don’t think it is something that can be ignored,” Grohman said. “We can’t have people doing whatever they want on boards and commissions, there are rules that need to be followed.” 

Grohman says the complaint, which was lodged by Alexa Plotkin, chair of the planning board, should be heard before the council.

Several councilors we spoke to say they do not understand why or how the mayor intends to move forward. 

When asked that question, Grohman acknowledged that he does not have an approach or plan worked out.  “I’m not sure, I’m not going to do it.  I think it has to come from the council chair or someone else.”

Emhiser was unavailable for comment as of press time.  He was the only councilor willing to bring the mayor’s proposal forward. Emhiser represents the city’s coastal area including the University of New England’s campus.  He is not seeking reelection.

Other members of the council say that they are somewhat baffled as to why Grohman is pursuing something that has so little support.

Councilor Marc Lessard said the mayor has the prerogative to pursue the item, but he also said “It’s really weird. It’s got me scratching my head.”

It’s really weird.
It’s got me scratching
my head.

— Councilor Marc Lessard

Council President Liam LaFountain said “It’s perplexing, but it’s the mayor’s prerogative.”

Councilor Norman Belanger echoed what Lessard and LaFountain said.

“I don’t get it,” he said. “Under Robert’s Rules of Order, it can be brought back up, but I don’t see this as proceeding forward.”

When contacted by the Gazette, Angers said he also does not understand the mayor’s dogged approach to remove him from the planning board. 

“I have no clue why he is continuing to go after me. I see it as Marty just being Marty,” Angers said.

Angers added that he has no plans to step down from the planning board but did say that his relationship with Board Chair Alexa Plotkin feels strained and awkward. 

Randy Seaver is the editor and founder of the Biddeford Gazette. He may be reached by email at randy@randyseaver.com



Never miss another update! Subscribe for free today!